We have located links that may give you full text access.
The pediatric fracture of the scaphoid in patients aged 13 years and under: an epidemiological study.
Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 2014 March
BACKGROUND: Fractures of the scaphoid are uncommon in the pediatric population. Despite their rarity, a significant number of children are referred to the fracture clinic for a suspected scaphoid fracture. The aim of this study was to report on the current incidence, pattern of injury, and the long-term outcomes following this injury in the pediatric population.
METHODS: Analysis of all pediatric scaphoid fractures presenting to a tertiary pediatric hospital (aged 13 y and under) over a 5-year period was performed. The case notes, radiographs, and other imaging studies for these patients were reviewed. Long-term functional outcome was assessed using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients of the 838 (6.7%) referred for a suspected scaphoid fracture were identified as having a confirmed diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture, giving an average annual incidence of 11 per 100,000. This group consisted of 39 boys (70%) and 17 girls (30%). The average age of incidence in boys was 12.2 years and in girls was 10.3 years (P<0.001). No scaphoid fractures were observed in boys below the age of 11 years and in girls below the age of 9 years. The most common type of fracture was a distal pole fracture (45 patients). One patient sustained a proximal pole fracture and went on to develop a nonunion. The duration of treatment in cast was shorter in distal pole fractures than in other types (P<0.001). At a mean follow-up of 70 months (range, 46 to 104 mo), 60% reported no limitation or impact when reporting a range of daily functional activities (mean DASH score=3.0).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a suggestion that the overall incidence of scaphoid fractures in the pediatric population is increasing, but children aged 13 years and under continue to maintain a distinct fracture pattern when compared with adolescents and adults. The majority involves the distal third of the scaphoid and carries a good prognosis with conservative management.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level 4.
METHODS: Analysis of all pediatric scaphoid fractures presenting to a tertiary pediatric hospital (aged 13 y and under) over a 5-year period was performed. The case notes, radiographs, and other imaging studies for these patients were reviewed. Long-term functional outcome was assessed using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Fifty-six patients of the 838 (6.7%) referred for a suspected scaphoid fracture were identified as having a confirmed diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture, giving an average annual incidence of 11 per 100,000. This group consisted of 39 boys (70%) and 17 girls (30%). The average age of incidence in boys was 12.2 years and in girls was 10.3 years (P<0.001). No scaphoid fractures were observed in boys below the age of 11 years and in girls below the age of 9 years. The most common type of fracture was a distal pole fracture (45 patients). One patient sustained a proximal pole fracture and went on to develop a nonunion. The duration of treatment in cast was shorter in distal pole fractures than in other types (P<0.001). At a mean follow-up of 70 months (range, 46 to 104 mo), 60% reported no limitation or impact when reporting a range of daily functional activities (mean DASH score=3.0).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a suggestion that the overall incidence of scaphoid fractures in the pediatric population is increasing, but children aged 13 years and under continue to maintain a distinct fracture pattern when compared with adolescents and adults. The majority involves the distal third of the scaphoid and carries a good prognosis with conservative management.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, Level 4.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app