We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Heart transplantation outcomes from cardiac arrest-resuscitated donors.
Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2013 November
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of heart transplantation from cardiopulmonary-resuscitated donors (CPR(+)) to those who received hearts from donors who did not require cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR(-)).
METHODS: This investigation was a retrospective analysis of UNOS adult heart transplantation donor and recipient data from May 1994 through July 2012. Discrete variables were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the t-test. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated using the actuarial method and compared using Wilcoxon's test.
RESULTS: Of the 29,242 adult heart transplantations performed in USA during the study period, 1,396 patients (4.7%) received hearts from CPR(+) donors. The patients in the CPR(+) group were younger (25.5 ± 15 years vs 28.5 ± 14 years; p < 0.0001) and more likely to be female (31% vs 27%; p = 0.001). Mean duration of CPR in these donors was 20 minutes. UNOS listing status at the time of transplantation was Status 1A for 54.3% of those in the CPR(+) group and 46.9% in the CPR(-) group (p < 0.0001). More recipients were hospitalized and were in the intensive care unit at transplantation in the CPR(+) group (56% vs 51%; p = 0.0008). Recipient survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 95.2%, 88.2% and 72.9% in CPR(+) group, and 94.7%, 87.7% and 74.4% in the CPR(-) group, respectively. Similarly, graft survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 94.7%, 87.6% and 71.9% in the CPR(+) donor hearts, and 94.4%, 87.3% and 73.2% in the CPR(-) donor hearts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This large, multicenter adult heart transplant database from across the USA did not show inferior outcomes in recipients of heart transplantation from selected CPR(+) donors. Recipient and graft survival were similar over 5 years of follow-up.
METHODS: This investigation was a retrospective analysis of UNOS adult heart transplantation donor and recipient data from May 1994 through July 2012. Discrete variables were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the t-test. Patient and graft survival rates were calculated using the actuarial method and compared using Wilcoxon's test.
RESULTS: Of the 29,242 adult heart transplantations performed in USA during the study period, 1,396 patients (4.7%) received hearts from CPR(+) donors. The patients in the CPR(+) group were younger (25.5 ± 15 years vs 28.5 ± 14 years; p < 0.0001) and more likely to be female (31% vs 27%; p = 0.001). Mean duration of CPR in these donors was 20 minutes. UNOS listing status at the time of transplantation was Status 1A for 54.3% of those in the CPR(+) group and 46.9% in the CPR(-) group (p < 0.0001). More recipients were hospitalized and were in the intensive care unit at transplantation in the CPR(+) group (56% vs 51%; p = 0.0008). Recipient survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 95.2%, 88.2% and 72.9% in CPR(+) group, and 94.7%, 87.7% and 74.4% in the CPR(-) group, respectively. Similarly, graft survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years was 94.7%, 87.6% and 71.9% in the CPR(+) donor hearts, and 94.4%, 87.3% and 73.2% in the CPR(-) donor hearts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This large, multicenter adult heart transplant database from across the USA did not show inferior outcomes in recipients of heart transplantation from selected CPR(+) donors. Recipient and graft survival were similar over 5 years of follow-up.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app