COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative effectiveness of empiric β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.

Journal of Pediatrics 2012 December
OBJECTIVE: To determine the comparative effectiveness of β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy on clinical outcomes in the treatment of children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included children aged 1-18 years who were hospitalized with CAP and received β-lactam antibiotic therapy either alone or in combination with a macrolide. Data were obtained from the Pediatric Health Information System. Associations between empiric antibiotic therapy and hospital readmission for the same episode of pneumonia were estimated using exact logistic regression. Associations between empiric antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay were estimated using a generalized estimating equation with negative binomial distribution.

RESULTS: There were 20 743 patients hospitalized with CAP. Of these, 24% received β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy on admission. Compared with children who received β-lactam monotherapy, children who received β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy were 20% less likely to stay in the hospital an additional day (adjusted relative risk 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86) but did not have a different readmission rate (relative risk 0.69; 95% CI, 0.41-1.12). An effect of combination treatment on reduced length of stay was not evident in children <6 years of age but increased with increasing age groups thereafter.

CONCLUSION: School-aged patients hospitalized with CAP who received β-lactam plus macrolide combination therapy have a shorter length of stay and similar rates of readmission compared with school-aged patients who receive β-lactam monotherapy.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app